I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
Раскрыты подробности о договорных матчах в российском футболе18:01，推荐阅读爱思助手下载最新版本获取更多信息
Photo:- Copy.ai，推荐阅读51吃瓜获取更多信息
第五条 县级以上人民政府应当加强对行政执法监督工作的组织领导，研究部署行政执法监督工作，支持和保障行政执法监督机构切实履行职责。。Line官方版本下载对此有专业解读